When the economy completely crashes and the people are pissed you know someone may take the blame and I think Bush may be in the lime light again as the 1 that screwed our country up. good, it;s time he answers for his incompetency with our children’s future’s!
-
When the economy completely crashes will Bush be brought up on charges?


Baby #1 Due 2/10/09 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Bush is no longer our president. It’s Obama’s responsibility to fix the economy. He needs to fix problems that are already present. With your train of thought, we might as well blame Clinton for 9/11.
Jim H 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Why do people blame Bush when he is only a front man for the real decision makers in the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the United States government. Do you even for a second believe the moron could run a country?
grandmac38 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
No it’s Obama’s baby now. He’ll just have to deal with it.
Are you really that stupid? Who’s stimulus package is the biggest? And if I remember correctly Obama voted for Bushes bail out!
Lib84 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Well Obama has said on many occasions that he doesn’t want to point fingers at the last administration. Right now his main focus is the mess they’ve made and fixing it.
Maybe in a couple years when things settle down.
But it’s doubtful.
DarkFrost 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Wouldn’t it be the Clinton’s fault?
OhNoooo 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Nice try Libatard
Jimmy D 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Obama should be brought up on charges for increasing spending and lowering taxes like bush. Obama is a war criminal for continuing Bushs illegal wars.
as.erwin 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Yes. They will charge Bush with the crime of giving home loans (starting way back when Clinton was president) to people who could not afford them…
You guys are so funny with your gear! The media tells you things are falling apart, and BOOM!
The FACT is, the recession is kind of a sham! Q2 of last year showed GROWTH in the GDP. Q3 showed a contraction… and we will not have the Q4 numbers until Friday of this week… If there was growth, there is not (and HAS NOT BEEN) a recession. If it shows a contraction, the recession (by definition) would have only started about 6 months ago…
We got through the recession in 92, we got through the recession in 2001, and we will get through this one.
Read some history! During the Great Depression, unemployment sat at around 25%… We are not even to 9% nationally… and in Texas (for example) we are still under 6% unemployment.
CRASH? Stop worshiping the media and study for yourself…
Miss S. 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Are you for real? The economy is not Bush’s fault. That’s like blaming one teacher for then entire failure of the US educational system. Why don’t you research it first and then come back with a good question.
Justin Case 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
No.
The peasants will be storming the white house with their torches, and pitchforks calling for Obama’s head on a stick.
Cat - astrophe 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Bush, although culpable to an extent, will not be the reason the economy completely crashes. It is being orchestrated to do so by globalist banksters who are hell bent on ‘re-distributing’ America’s wealth into foreign hands. Democrats and Republicans alike are part of the agenda, and you would have to arrest 90% of Washington and the entire Federal Reserve System to get to the bottom of the mess.
Patrick G 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqLvBUSJucg
Bush: Our children do learn
Often Imitated, NEVER Duplicated 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
he should be, but his sycophant followers will blame bill clinton & obama
RealFast 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Obama just gave a speech that a President can do little to stimulate an economy, but the economy is ran by the people working in it. It is their ideas that keeps an economy in strong health.
Why would Bush be charged for what people did?
betty boop 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
If you want to charge Bush fine- but you have to charge everyone else that had a piece of this pie. this will include dems and reps – as well as Clinton and probably other past presidents.
thor_torkinson 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Just can’t get a frame around the big picture, can you Jim?
trlc27 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
man you are about as ignorant to what really happened as my 2 year old. CLINTON screwed this economy. learn some true facts baby.
Matt 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
NO!!!!!!, one because he not even the president anymore and two because it not even his fault
jim.miller11 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
So you think he’s a complete idiot, dumb as a doornail, but somehow singlehandedly takes down the largest economy in the world?
Take a breath. W is not president anymore.
Besides, I thought your boy was the Hope we all needed, and he’s so intelligent, and all will be well? Can’t he fix everything?
duvvbrand 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Where does Obama factor into this??
I guess we can blame him in 6 years…
u_bin_called 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
only if it happens before September 11, 2009…
…as you know NOTHING that happens after that can be blamed on the previous administration…
Rev-'em-up Wright *rerun* 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Think much? I doubt it. Ask Maxine Waters, Obama, Chris Dodd, Barney franks what happened to the US economy. Geeez, this ain’t rocket science.
Roger M 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
No, he broke no laws.
look to democrats like Barney Franks who controlled banking for someone to convist. Nancy P had her hands in control of banks too.
The President does not control the economy as much as the Congress does.
DesiDani(still waiting for 12am) 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
That all falls on Obama now. Bush is cooking BBQ now at his ranch in THE GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
Big Cazzo 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
No.
Do you people understand its CONGRESS That writes the checks?
When did we plummet? when the liberal CONGRESS took over.
Pro is the opposite of Con, whats the opposite of Progress?
CONGRESS
richer_than_you1971 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
it would make more sense to charge every senator and member of congress as they have more control over the economy than the President does
Mike 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
No but Obama will be impeached!
my dog joey 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
He will have to face the charges for his documented crimes first.
Such as Torture
Quagmire 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Nope. Because the democratic Congress would be brought up on charges too and Obama won’t let that happen. BTW, the economy has crashed.
iDunno 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
Maybe they should charge all the democrats that took over Washington right before the economy tanked.
Samm 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
So when can we charge Clinton first?
Megan S 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
I don’t think you pay attention very much.
What charges would he be brought up on?
Saerlaith 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
No
sweetypie9 8:34 am on December 17, 2009 Permalink |
While holding Bush accountable is a dream come true, wouldn’t it be better if we held ALL politician’s accountable? I mean think… why do policiticans become politicians? They will tell us its because they want to see our lives get better but in reality they look out for their own back pockets. If Bush should be brought up on any charge, then all other politicians should be too.
If you want to see some CHANGE, how about seeing these politicians work for little to NOTHING?
Maybe that will change America’s tune a little…